VA Cuts Over 1,000 Jobs to Save Costs and Improve Veteran Services

The VA has terminated over 1,000 probationary employees to cut costs and redirect savings to veteran services, sparking criticism from lawmakers and unions.

In a significant move late Thursday, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced the termination of more than 1,000 employees who were still in their probationary period.

This decision aligns with a broader initiative from the White House aimed at shrinking the federal workforce, particularly targeting those who are new to their roles.

Impact on Workforce and Savings

VA Secretary Doug Collins articulated that this strategy could yield roughly $98 million in annual savings.

He assured that these funds would be redirected to improve services and benefits for veterans.

Although he expressed appreciation for the work of the departed employees, Collins underscored that this step is essential for enhancing support to veterans and their families.

Collins also aimed to quell concerns that these layoffs would negatively impact VA healthcare services or veteran benefits.

He promised that details on how the savings will specifically support veterans, caregivers, families, and survivors would be shared shortly.

Criticism and Reaction

The VA’s workforce consists of around 479,000 people engaged in various functions, including healthcare, benefits administration, memorial services, and program support.

Among these, approximately 43,000 individuals are currently in their probationary stage, having been employed for less than two years.

Officials pointed out that many of these probationers were shielded from termination due to their involvement in mission-critical roles or union memberships.

Interestingly, at least one person from the Veterans Crisis Line was reported among those who lost their jobs.

Although VA management permitted supervisors to recommend certain managers for exempt status from termination, the window for submitting such requests was quite brief.

This announcement comes on the heels of a buyout initiative from the White House, allowing federal employees the chance to resign for up to eight months of severance.

Only about 75,000 took advantage of this offer, which fell short of the administration’s target of 200,000 resignations.

Future Implications

Opposition quickly emerged as protests erupted outside VA headquarters in Washington, D.C., organized by Democratic lawmakers and union leaders against what they saw as potential staffing and budget cuts.

Critics condemned the layoffs, decrying the focus on newly hired federal workers as unjust and accusing the administration of using this as a means to streamline the government rather than a genuine effort for improvement.

Senator Richard Blumenthal, who serves on the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, characterized the move as shortsighted.

He argued that dismissing probationary employees undermines the considerable investment made in their hiring and training.

The American Federation of Government Employees voiced similar sentiments, asserting that these cuts do not signal improved efficiency but rather an assault on the federal workforce, aimed at silencing employees and prioritizing connections over skills.

As the situation unfolds, concerns are growing that more federal employees may find themselves facing termination under this initiative.

However, the Office of Personnel Management has yet to provide any estimates regarding the scope of potential further cuts.

Source: Militarytimes